MT202
MT202 is the SWIFT message type for a general financial institution transfer: a payment instruction in which one bank moves funds to another bank, for the bank's own account or on behalf of another financial institution. Every party in an MT202 is a financial institution, which is what separates it from the MT103 used for customer credit transfers.

What MT202 is used for
Banks use MT202 for bank to bank payments where no end customer is the ordering or beneficiary party. Typical uses:- funding or settling a nostro account held with a correspondent
- interbank lending, money market deals and foreign exchange settlement in treasury operations
- moving liquidity between branches or group entities
- settling obligations between correspondent banks in the correspondent banking network

Key features of an MT202
- Every party is a financial institution: there's no ordering customer or beneficiary customer, and no remittance information for end customers.
- It belongs to SWIFT category 2, the financial institution transfers. Like every SWIFT message, it's built from text blocks, with the fields in the text block (block 4).
- A few mandatory fields carry the transaction reference number, related reference, value date, currency and amount, and the beneficiary institution.
- SWIFT checks it against network validated rules before it reaches the recipient's bank.
- It moves funds between the books of banks, so it's settled through nostro and vostro accounts or a payment system rather than credited to a customer's account.

MT202 vs MT103
| MT103 | MT202 | MT202 COV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Single customer credit transfer | Financial institution transfer | Cover for an underlying customer credit transfer |
| Ordering party | A customer (person or company) | A financial institution | A financial institution, with the original customer shown |
| Beneficiary | A customer's account | A financial institution | A financial institution, with the end beneficiary shown |
| Typical use | A business paying a supplier abroad | Interbank transfers and treasury | Settling an MT103 sent with the cover method |
| ISO 20022 successor | pacs.008 | pacs.009 | pacs.009 COV |

How an MT202 moves through the correspondent banking network
Take a Finnish bank that needs to pay USD 2 million to a Japanese bank to settle a foreign exchange deal. Neither bank holds an account with the other, so the transfer funds move through their correspondents:- The sending bank sends an MT202 to its US dollar correspondent, its sender's correspondent, which holds the bank's nostro account.
- The correspondent debits the Finnish bank's account and passes the payment to the receiver's correspondent, the bank that holds the Japanese bank's dollar account.
- That bank credits the Japanese bank, the beneficiary institution, on the value date.

MT202 COV and the cover method
In the cover method, the ordering bank sends an MT103 straight to the beneficiary's bank with the customer payment information, and a separate MT202 through its correspondent banks to move the funds. Before 2009, that second message carried no details of the underlying customer credit transfer. Intermediary banks moved the money without seeing who it was for, which made anti money laundering screening and sanctions screening impossible along the way.SWIFT introduced MT202 COV in November 2009 to close that gap. It has a second block that copies the ordering customer, beneficiary customer and remittance information from the underlying MT103, so every bank in the payment chain can screen the full payment. Banks must use MT202 COV, not a plain MT202, whenever the transfer covers a customer payment. Using a plain MT202 to hide a customer payment is a compliance breach.
The main MT202 fields
| Field | Name | What it holds |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Transaction reference number | The sender's unique reference for the message |
| 21 | Related reference | A reference to the related transaction, such as the deal or the underlying MT103 |
| 32A | Value date, currency code, amount | When and how much is settled |
| 52a | Ordering institution | The institution that orders the transfer, if not the sender |
| 53a | Sender's correspondent | The account the sender uses to reimburse the receiver |
| 54a | Receiver's correspondent | Where the funds will be made available to the receiver |
| 56a | Intermediary | Any intermediary bank between the receiver and the account with institution |
| 57a | Account with institution | The institution where the beneficiary institution holds its account |
| 58a | Beneficiary institution | The financial institution that receives the funds (mandatory) |
| 72 | Sender to receiver information | Free-text instructions, with structured codes |

MT202 after the move to ISO 20022
Cross-border payments on SWIFT are moving from MT messages to ISO 20022. The coexistence period for payment instructions ended in November 2025. Banks are now expected to send a pacs.009 instead of an MT202, and a pacs.009 COV instead of an MT202 COV, with the customer side of a payment sent as a pacs.008.ISO 20022 messages carry richer, structured data, such as full party names, structured addresses and longer remittance information, which helps with screening and reconciliation. MT202 still appears in older systems, bank statements and documentation, so you'll keep seeing the term for some time.
What it means for a business
You won't send an MT202 yourself. Businesses send customer credit transfers (MT103 or pacs.008), and their bank or payment service provider sends any MT202 or pacs.009 needed to settle them through its correspondents. You may still be asked for one: a supplier chasing a late SWIFT payment sometimes asks for "the MT202" when what helps is the MT103 or pacs.008 confirmation with the UETR. For tracing, the UETR is the reference to share.
FAQ
MT103 is a customer credit transfer: a person or company is paying someone else's account. MT202 is a financial institution transfer: a bank is moving its own funds, or another bank's, to a financial institution.
COV stands for cover. An MT202 COV settles an underlying customer payment sent with the cover method and repeats the ordering and beneficiary customer details so intermediary banks can screen them.
Less and less. Since November 2025, banks are expected to send pacs.009 for cross-border financial institution transfers, but the MT202 name still appears in older systems and documents.
Usually not. A business payment is a customer credit transfer, so ask for the MT103 or pacs.008 confirmation and the UETR instead.

Related terms and sources
MT103 · pacs.008 · UETR · Correspondent bank · Nostro and vostro accounts · ISO 20022 · Guide to SWIFT payments · Browse the full glossary
Last reviewed November 2, 2026Disclaimer
This publication is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax, or other professional advice from Narvi Payments Oy Ab or its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
This publication is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax, or other professional advice from Narvi Payments Oy Ab or its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.

What We Offer
IBAN Accounts For Your Business
Support & Compliance
Narvi Knowledge Center
Alternative Investment Funds [whitepaper]Family Offices [whitepaper]Shipping Industry [whitepaper]How to Open a Business Account in FinlandNarvi vs. Wise, Revolut, N26, and other alternativesNarvi vs. Stable.comNarvi vs. payabl.Narvi vs. ConnectPayNarvi vs. IBAN4UNarvi vs. GenomeNarvi vs. PaxumNarvi vs. BilderlingsNarvi vs. NetellerNarvi vs. KontistPayments BlogPayments Glossary
Narvi Payments Oy Ab is an Authorized Electronic Money Institution (EMI). Narvi’s EMI license is granted by the Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority (FIN FSA) with the registration number 3190214-6. Narvi’s license is passportised to all European Union countries.
© 2026 Narvi. All Rights Reserved.
v1.331.0