Source of funds vs source of wealth

Source of funds is where the money in a specific payment or business relationship comes from. Source of wealth is how a person or company built up its total assets over time. Account providers check source of funds routinely, and ask about source of wealth when the risk is higher, for example when a beneficial owner is a politically exposed person.

section

Source of funds vs source of wealth

Source of fundsSource of wealth
The questionWhere did this money come from?How did this person or company become this wealthy?
ScopeOne payment, or the funds moving through an accountTotal assets, built up over years
Typical evidenceInvoices, contracts, statements showing the money arrivingSale of a business, dividends, salary history, inheritance, investment statements
When it's asked forOnboarding, and large or unexpected paymentsEnhanced due diligence on higher-risk relationships
A company can have a perfectly explained source of funds, such as a payment from a customer, while the provider still needs to understand the source of wealth of the person who owns it.
section

When a provider asks for each

Source of funds comes up at onboarding, when the provider asks where the first deposits will come from, and again whenever a payment doesn't fit the expected pattern: a large transaction, a new counterparty or an unusual country.Source of wealth belongs to enhanced due diligence. AML rules require it in higher-risk situations, including relationships with politically exposed persons, links to high-risk third countries and complex or unusually large transactions with no obvious purpose. For a company, the question is usually asked about its ultimate beneficial owners rather than the company itself.
section

Evidence that works for a business

Where the money comes fromEvidence that usually satisfies the check
Trading revenueInvoices and contracts matched to incoming payments
Investment from shareholdersShareholder or subscription agreement, plus the investor's statement showing the transfer
A loanLoan agreement and drawdown confirmation
Sale of an asset or businessSale agreement and completion statement
Funding from another group companyIntercompany agreement and group accounts
A UBO's personal wealthSale documents for a previous business, dividend or salary records, investment statements, a will or probate document
A bank statement on its own shows that money moved, not why. Providers look for the document that explains the payment, plus the statement that shows it arriving. See the documents Narvi asks for when you open an account.
section

Funds that come from crypto activity

When euros in a business account come from selling crypto-assets, the provider needs the trail from the exchange to the account: statements from the exchange account held in the company's name, the withdrawal records, and the matching incoming transfer. The exchange's own licence matters too. Crypto-asset businesses should also read VASP onboarding.
section

FAQ

Usually not on its own. It shows that money arrived, not where it came from or why, so providers ask for the underlying document as well: the invoice, contract or agreement.

Providers have to monitor relationships on an ongoing basis. A payment that's larger or different from what you declared at onboarding means they have to check it before or after it goes through.

Not always. It's an enhanced due diligence measure, so it's asked for when the relationship is higher risk, for example when a UBO is a politically exposed person.
section
section
Last reviewed October 21, 2026Disclaimer
This publication is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax, or other professional advice from Narvi Payments Oy Ab or its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
section